Odd-e的唤醒者Daniel Teng (滕振宇)

Daniel談到的持續學習,去解決團隊的阻礙令我印象深刻。

團隊要跑scrum很大的前提是,團隊成員都是成年人,團隊成員都願意持續學習去解決問題。
但,如果團隊有不是這樣的人(成年人),我想scrum也會變得窒礙難行。
昨天看到Daniel分享團隊的測試方法包含:
1. Session-based testing
2. Risk-based testing
稍微做一下research session-based testing management
看到一段很有感觸,提到作者的同事聽到SBTM的看法。
“Seems like too much bureaucracy” 
 
One colleague of mine, upon hearing me talk about this approach, expressed the concern that senior testers would balk at all the paperwork associated with the session sheets. All that structure, she felt, would just get in the way of what senior testers already know how to do. Although my first instinct was to argue with her, on second thought, she was giving me an important reality check. This approach does impose a structure that is not strictly necessary in order to achieve the mission of good testing. Segmenting complex and interwoven test tasks into distinct little sessions is not always easy or natural. Session-based test management is simply one way to bring more accountability to exploratory testing, for those situations where accountability is especially important.
我的想法是
不管是scrum的各種fancy word. 都是方法,框架,團隊成員常常會被名詞限制住。
不論用什麼方法,重點是能解決問題,不斷的修正,改變,一次比一次進步才是最重要的。
廣告

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 / 變更 )

連結到 %s